OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of congruence in the perception of the evolution of back pain during treatment and in the expectations about the future of back pain problems. Congruence was defined as the agreement between patient and therapist on various aspects of back pain problems and of treatment.

DESIGN: Semistructured interviews at the beginning and the end of treatment.

SUBJECTS: Seventy-one back pain patients and their therapists (6 chiropractors and 6 rheumatologists).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Synthesized index of congruence based on 24 questions asked of both the patient and his/her therapist.

RESULTS: The distribution of the congruence scores indicated a high level of congruence in 39.4% of the cases, an average level in 35.2% and a low level in 25.4%. The results demonstrated that congruence was significantly associated with the perception of an improvement in back pain. This positive perception was nevertheless associated with the expectation of persistence or recurrence of the back pain problem in the future. Noncongruence was correlated with the patient's estimation of a less favorable evolution of the back pain problem during the treatment and with a major difficulty for both the therapist and the patient to express clear expectations about the future of the patient's back pain problem.

CONCLUSIONS: Congruence mainly reflects an agreement that the treatment is aimed at the management of a long-term condition rather than at the resolution of the back pain problem. Congruent patients seem to accept living with their back problems, a position shared by their therapists, whereas noncongruent patients do not seem to share this conception of back pain.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Article only available in print.